The “Obama Phone Lady” Sounds Off Again, One Year Later

Tags:  Obama presidency, Mitt Romney, politics, opinion, protesters, interviews, obamaphone

Obama Re-election Aftermath, New Demographic Math, Coming US Economic Collapse

This Is Newsweeks Post Election Message to the GOP

Preface: Many Americans might recall that just recently Newsweek Magazine published a cover with a photograph of Barack Obama with the headline: “Hit the road Barack, Why We Need A New President” inferring their opinion it was time for Obama to leave office and give Mitt Romney a shot at saving the nation from fiscal ruin. Now glance to the right and take in the pompous new portraiture of the re-elected Barack Obama. Very odd, Huh? You know it’s bad when one of the most Left leaning magazines in the nation signals it’s ready for a failed incumbent to leave. Yet in essence, what happened is that the youth and the ethnic population of the country, along with Big Hollywood, re-elected him anyway. Now there is really no way to avert a fiscal calamity.

I’ve been slowly absorbing the election results, mulling over what it means for the country’s future. As we all know, not everyone is accepting Obama’s re-election victory with accepting grace. Donald Trump was especially undone by the win. He tweeted some rather unglued comments about it which you can see here.

It took me about a day to recover from the shock of watching NBC call the election for Obama before all the votes had even been counted in eight states. Watching the NBC TV anchors act as Obama cheerleaders during the moments right before they called the election was bizarre, discomforting.I was reminded of what I have told readers repeatedly during the last four years. We don’t really have a “free press” in the United States. We have the “mock appearance of a free press” which is, in fact, directly connected to the CFR, the Bilderberg group and the policy mandates of the White House.

This was never made so apparent as it was during the two hours before NBC called the election for Barack Obama. Some states were placed in the Obama ‘win’ column while the vote counts still read “0.02% of votes counted.”  Others were assigned to Obama while voting was still a dead heat. In several instances a state was called for Obama while the voting tally was only 20 or 30% of votes counted. When NBC called the election for Obama, Ohio’s votes were yet to all be counted, more than 25% of the votes in California had not been counted, Florida was still in play, Virginia was still in play, Colorado was still in play.

Essentially the election was called for Obama while more than 30% of the nation’s votes were yet to be counted. That doesn’t exactly seem like a fair way to determine who won. Beverly Harris of Blackboxvoting.com has stated repeatedly in her research that it is technically impossible for all votes to be tallied within five or ten minutes of precincts closing, no matter which state it is. It always takes from 30 to 45 minutes for the final count to be finished.

Yet within 3 to 4 minutes of state precincts closing as the night went on, winners were announced live on air by NBC anchor Brian Williams and his pundits. It was almost as if they were putting on a convincing and very glamorous show of pretending to count the votes. It was all happening very fast. I couldn’t understand how votes could be tallied in state after state within minutes of precincts closing, then called, but that’s what was happening. It all had the appearance of a very shiny well oiled machine, down to the USA map on the NYC ice skating rink with the towering flame red and electric blue electoral vote tower flanking the well lit golden “fallen angel” statue positioned dead center of the TV screen. If this was not pure political theatre then I am stone blind.

It went on like this, in plain view while I grappled with the “clockwork precision” by NBC in stacking up the electoral vote counts for about 2-3 hours on the west coast before NBC called the election for Obama shortly after 11 pm. I was sitting in my living room looking at a map of the US which showed that the entire heartland of the nation had voted for Mitt Romney in one huge red block, excepting only Colorado and New Mexico. I pondered what it could possibly mean for the future of the United States that the will of the people who live in it’s heartland, who grow corn and wheat for the entire world, who have raised their families by Christian principles since their ancestors rolled across the prairies over a hundred and fifty years ago, had once again been completely ignored in a presidential election.

I am also pondering what it might mean for America further down the road that our youth and Latino vote now swings entire presidential elections to the Left. I wondered how many of those Latino voters might have been illegals. It dawned on me that allowing the US southern border to remain wide open for four more years under Obama’s first term had possibly been part of a larger a strategy for re-election, not mere D.C. federal border neglect. The Obama White House had wanted and needed all those millions of illegals to stream into the country to help swing the 2012 vote. His demographic bean counters would have known that. And that is exactly what happened. Is that why Obama never confronted immigration reform during his first term? He would have needed a wide open southern border with 10,000 illegals coming in each week to help stack the 2012 re-election deck in his favor. I’m speculating here, but if this is true it’s a really sad, very dreary aha moment.

The  men and women whose ancestors literally sweated and strained and lived and died on the prairies of the nation’s midsection, predominantly white families of European descent who carved out farms and ranches from raw buffalo grassland  in the early 1800s, are losing the majority control of their own country. It’s no longer a speculative theory. It is now a demographic fact. Maybe it’s just me, but I really feel that it cannot bode well for the future of the nation when the descendants of those who founded it lose political and demographic control of the land their ancestors civilized from virgin prairie.

Winner and Loser? Bloomberg Businessweek imagines what President Obama and Mitt Romney would have looked like in 2016 after four years in the White HouseMany would argue that the only constant is CHANGE. But there are certain directions that unforeseen demographic CHANGE can take which threaten the literal sovereign foundations of a nation. An examination of what is happening to parts of Europe due to overwhelming sudden masses of new immigrants might give Americans a hint of what could happen here. In fact, in my opinion, it’s already happening.

In the current political atmosphere in the U.S. any individual who speaks out in support of the leadership of the white middle class is reviled for being a racist. I am well aware of that fact. I’m part native American but my white European ancestry is important to me and it connects me to 65% of other Americans whose ancestors literally helped to build the nation 150 years ago. Their voices matter greatly, but their voices are not being heard. They are being drowned out by the voices of other Americans who are either recent immigrants or they are too young to realize that the the policies and theories of the Far Left – when allowed to run their full course to the bitter end – have historically brought great nations to utter ruin. History has shown this to be true time and again. One really has to look no further than the Fall of Rome for a case-in-point snapshot.

If the UN wanted to tacitly break the back of Christian middle America in order to prepare the “new American demography” for merger into the coming global superstate, this election victory would be another incremental step toward that goal. Loss of US national sovereignty is NOT the will of the white Christian middle class. I feel I can make that statement with a fair amount of confidence. I look around. I listen. I follow my own deep gut. That’s not where middle America wants to go. But if the Far Left half of the nation tries to drag the whole country down that road toward US dissolution and eventual merger with the UN, civil war will be the inevitable result. That’s not a hard call to make. It’s a no brainer. I don’t want to see it come to that.

That’s why I write. I write in the hopes of talking sense to the young and the clueless on the Left who don’t know better, who are dazzled daily by all the shiny toys of social media, TV social engineering PSY-OPS and pseudo-political make believe. The young American Left and the Latino community needs to awaken to the extent that they are being played in all of this to bend the nation toward an eventual UN merger and loss of US constitutional sovereignty. It cannot be allowed to happen. That, more than anything else, is why I write.

I was praying on election night and I asked the Holy Spirit to reveal to me what Tuesday’s election results would foretell for the country. I saw, what in effect, appeared to be a 1 1/2 year period of “false economic recovery and prosperity” beginning in 2013 and extending to the first half of 2014, where renewed deficit spending pours more than 4.3 trillion new dollars into the US economy, as Obama’s fiscal spend-a-thon continues into his second term. By the summer of 2014 the horrendous karma of all this rebounds onto the nation and the bill comes due. Fiscal hyper-inflation of the US dollar ensues. The US economy all but collapses, depending on what one’s definition of “collapse” is. The 4.3 trillion in renewed federal spending would buy the nation another year and a half of false hope and change, then it goes to pieces as the debt crushes the nation into a German style era of collapsing currency worth and skyrocketing prices. Two days later I saw this eerily prophetic blog post:

http://coffeeandsleeplessnights.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/why-stop-at-18-794-trillion/

~~~&&@&&~~

A close family friend, an employer, has already told me that in order for his business to survive during the next four years, he will have to cut back his employees’ hours and decline to give his staff the annual pay raise they usually get once a year. I was still absorbing his announcement when I saw this headline this morning from another blogger. [See below.]  I am still surveying collected videos and headlines about reactions to the Obama win, along with related news, so this post will be updated all week:

Vegas Employer: “Obama Won, So I Fired 22 Employees”

Mourning in America – Here’s Those Layoffs We Voted For Tuesday

Obama Supporters Celebrate Election Victory: “No More Israel… Fuck That Shit, Kill Those Mother Fuckers”

UN Plotting Takeover of the Internet

‘Maybe he will get assassinated this term!’ Woman, 22, fired and reported to Secret Service after Facebook threat to Obama

State Dept: U.S. Economy ‘Going to Get Downgraded’

Glenn Beck: ‘Freedom Is at Stake, and Freedom Lost Last Night’

Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood: “Obama Must Accept Will of Arab People”

Obama Shuts Down 1.6 Million Acres to Oil Drilling

Stocks Drop More Than 3% Since Obama Re-election

Companies plan massive layoffs as Obamacare becomes reality

Related articles

Tuesday November 6th 2012: Americans Choose Their Future

“It’s a numbers game. The nation is leaning so far to the left at this moment that I can hear California falling into the sea. The 2012 election, more than anything, is a contest of competing American demographics that favor the young and the foolish over the old and the wise. Brace yourself for the next four years of America under Barack Obama. The demographics of the nation are leaning in his favor.”

– Screenshot news blog

Presidential Election Map of Electoral Votes 2012

Last Day of the Campaign – A Snapshot

Follow Election Day Results Live Real-time on Politico.com website

This is my last blog post about the 2012 presidential campaign, and boy, am I ever glad. I’ve never become so weary of an election year as I have this one. Neither have I ever witnessed such a vapid presidential campaign, utterly devoid of real vision, exciting leadership, new ideas, or real innovative solutions – by either candidate. I have to admit this year’s election has become tedious, tiresome, more than a little bit bleached. It has not gone unnoticed by me that the robustly obscene 1 billion dollars these two opponents have spent duking it out over the airwaves could have rebuilt a good part of New Jersey. It’s an embarrassing display of American decadence. The whole election process almost shames me to watch it.

I just want this over with. Every time another political ad airs on TV I scream at the banality of it all: paid actors reading lines for cardboard props masquerading as politicians. I’ve had it. Put us out of our misery. Let voting Tuesday come, please.

I already voted about a week ago [ I voted for Romney ] but frankly it’s not as if the choice placed before me was exactly stellar. I went for Romney based on his solid business background, well knowing his foreign policy skills are not that great. But I can be assured if Mitt Romney wins the White House he won’t hop on Air Force One and jet around the world, literally bowing to the waist to the Arab Sheiks who run OPEC. That was a moment of American shame I don’t think I will ever forget from four years ago. Under a Romney presidency I am fairly convinced that Congress, the Senate and the White House will all get along better and will make a real effort to work together to solve our country’s many complex and pressing problems. I just have that gut level hunch, call it “woman’s intuition” that Mitt Romney is a man who can get along with Democrats when he needs to, that he well knows how to cross the political aisle and get the ear of the other side on issues, and that his leadership style won’t inspire all-out vitriol. In fact, I think he will discourage it. We need that.

I believe a Romney presidency will kick start a new era in D.C. of “take no prisoners” fiscal policy, where every piece of ludicrous pork that has been sliding under the radar in the federal budget for years will now be on the chopping block, where states will assume greater responsibility for the financial destinies of their own regions, where the re-invigoration of the U.S. military will resume to guarantee that our enemies well know our strength and therefore choose not to test it. I have no problem with any of that. America stands alone with few real friends in a dangerous wing-nut world and we need to maintain our military strength. It’s the only thing standing between us and all-0ut global anarchy. I am smart enough to see that with my own eyes. I’m not spiritually asleep and I am not misguided about how precarious the world situation actually is. I do not operate under the foolish notion that we can negotiate with the worldwide movement of radical Islam toward global Jihad with the West. I pity the Left Wing ideologues who think that appeasement and “cultural inclusiveness” will make the wickedness of the world go away. They are so dead wrong at this moment in American history that it does truly bring pause. We have to maintain a strong military or we can expect suicide bombers to start detonating on American streets within a year or two. These are the facts and I am not averse to facing them.

I am of the mind that the less federal government we have the better off the nation is. Period. I believe a Romney presidency will begin setting itself to the task of either seriously reforming Obamacare, or just rolling back the legislation altogether. I’m all for that. Barack Obama steam rolled that law into existence over the vociferous and strenuous protests of literally millions of middle Americans three years ago this past summer, and that was the beginning of the souring of middle America onto Mr. Obama. Our voices were disregarded and we didn’t appreciate it one bit.

My instinct is that a Romney presidency would bring a renewed interest in Washington D.C. of actually listening to the voice of the American people and cooperating with it, rather than ignoring it. Because of Romney’s religious background I don’t get the feeling he is going to be a “gung-ho UN” sort of guy. I could be really wrong about this but I think he has the wisdom to know that we need to keep the United Nations out of American affairs whenever possible. In fact, I actually think that alot of good could come out of a Romney presidency that would begin the behemoth task of turning the nation’s fortunes around.

The only problem with all of this is that I actually doubt Romney can win, unless undecided voters have some sort of real spiritual epiphany between today and tomorrow. They are holding all the cards in this election, along with women voters, Latino voters, and college aged voters who voted for Obama the last time.  There’s always the hope that the millions of first time voters who sent Barack Obama to the White House four years ago will change their minds this time and vote for the other guy. There’s always the hope that they might have a real change of heart, after living unemployed in their parent’s basement for three years, subsisting on food stamps, submitting their resume to more than 200 companies every 90 days with no response, finally slumming it up at the “Occupy” protests because they have little else to do. Maybe these young American Obama minions from 2008  have reconsidered, maybe they have possibly decided that they are sick of living in their mom’s basements and that “a change would do them good.”

That’s what it would take at this point for Romney to win: the young people who are college aged, the Hispanic / Latino vote and the undecided women voters would have to come out IN FORCE voting for Mitt Romney in order to tip the scales and change the future of the nation.

At a certain point all one can do is throw up their hands to fate, sit back and watch. But here is what the country will face under four more years of Barack Obama. For young people, don’t pack your ripped jeans yet, because you will be living in your mama’s basement for quite some time yet to come. There won’t be any substantial change in the jobless numbers during 2013-2016 under Obama. Just renew your food stamp card instead. For Islamic radicals who are poised to infiltrate every media outlet in the country in order to “soften up the American citizen” to the idea of a nation whose population is 25 to 40% Muslim within 10 years, congratulations. Your guy won. You may now proceed to advance your “Islamification” of America program unabated, and with the full political support of the Commander-in-Chief. For the Occupy movement with it’s communist / socialist underpinnings and it’s murky connections to the CIA sponsored “Anonymous” group, congratulations as well. Go out there and start tearing up the city squares again, shitting in the streets, breaking glass and setting fires. Your guy won. You now have official permission from the Obama White House to raise hell and get out of jail free for it.

And finally a word of caution to any US Ambassador who is serving overseas in a precariously violent and volatile environ. Don’t bother sending any more emails to the Obama State Department to beg for military support and back-up. He just won re-election. Your requests will be ignored. His White House is not thinking about you. Just like Christopher Stevens, you have been officially thrown under the bus by the Obama White House. You may consider your service to America as a sacrifice which may include your death at the hands of radical Islamic hellions who hate you while you work to bring civilized society to their ravaged failed states. Your nation is not going to back you up in your position so you may as well know that in advance. You are serving under the Obama administration, so all bets are off that your frantic emails calling for help will even be noticed before the throngs set fire to your diplomatic outpost and suffocate you in it. That’s what happened to Christopher Stevens and it could happen to you.

For the voters who are re-choosing Barack Obama and inviting four more years of American decline in so doing, realize that it won’t be reversible by 2016. There is a tipping point just ahead. Beyond that, I don’t see how the fortunes of the nation can be re-directed without the pretext of another war. Wars have been used to re-ignite failing economies before. I’m sure it’s not off the table as the Obama White House plans their next four years. It really saddens me that there is no averting this outcome. But such a massive change of heart among young liberal voters, women voters and ethnic voters is not something I see happening. I can blog my heart out and it won’t make a bit of difference.

It’s a numbers game. The nation is leaning so far to the left right now that I can hear California falling into the sea. The 2012 election, more than anything, is a contest of competing American demographics that favor the young and the foolish over the old and the wise. Brace yourself for the next four years of America under Barack Obama. The demographics of the nation are leaning in his favor.

Has the 2012 US Presidential Election Been Rigged?

Barack Obama 2009 presidential inauguration

Barack Obama 2009 presidential inauguration (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Back Story, Inauguration Day 2009:

I began to get a sinking feeling in the pit of my stomach while I watched newly elected President Obama give his inaugural speech on January 20th 2009. He made reference in the speech to his “eight year term in office” thereby verbally re-electing himself for another eight years the very moment he first opened his mouth to speak on his first term inauguration. I almost fell out of my chair. About an hour later I logged onto the internet which I thought would surely be buzzing with alarm over Obama’s outrageous [gaffe? or not?] comment made during his speech. Not a word was said about it anywhere. I could not believe my eyes. Had the entire nation become so drunk on Obama Kool-Aid that literally NO ONE heard Mr. Obama make this comment? I was dumbstruck over it.

I got the sickening creepy feeling that the NWO insiders had already set Obama’s term of office as eight years, and that we would be subjected to some sort of phony-baloney make believe 2012 re-election campaign four years later.

Fast forward: we are here, four years later. Look around you at what is happening at the polls. Voting machines in at least four states [ CO, NV, TX, NC, OH ] are recording Romney votes as Obama votes. I have read three different accounts of this happening just today. Is this election a sham? Has it been rigged from the start?

See also http://www.youtube.com/user/thetruthergirls?feature=watch

Fraud? More ballots for Romney show Obama

RNC pushes 6 states to fix machines that give Romney votes to Obama

As Ohio Faces Vote-Rigging Lawsuit, Are Dems, Liberals, Election Officials Ready to Safeguard Votes?

Romney votes in Colorado might count for Obama? RNC, officials on computer glitch

Pueblo CO GOP: Machines switched Romney votes to Obama

“I understand that, in a significant number of cases, voting machines in your states have populated a vote for Barack Obama when a voter cast his or her ballot for Mitt Romney,” wrote RNC chief counsel John Phillipe to secretaries of state in Nevada, Ohio, Kansas, North Carolina, Missouri, and Colorado. “I further understand that the causes of this problem are varied, and include mis-calibration and hyper-sensitivity of the machines,” he acknowledged. But he called for four actions at the state level:

1. All voting machines be recalibrated before Election Day.

2. Additional technicians in the event of further issues.

3. Sign notification reminding voters to double-check the correctness of their ballot in the machine before final submission.

4. Verbal guidance to remind voters to make sure that the ballot they cast is correct.

“I believe these common-sense steps will greatly assist voters on Election Day,”

Tags: 2012 voting rigged machines, vote fraud 2012 elections, CIA surveillance of the internet, truth reporters, truther girls, truthers, citizen journalism, we the people report the news, FED surveillance of the internet, truth reporting, alternative news outlets, alternative news channels youtube

Many Americans Believe There Is No Discernible Real Difference Between Romney and Obama

Chuck Baldwin @ Capital University

Chuck Baldwin @ Capital University

 

This letter crossed my desk this am and I am re-posting it for readers. Are we being subjected to a make-believe presidential election between the two “make-believe” opposing political parties? Read what Chuck Baldwin has to say on this topic and then decide for yourself.

 

Read the original at http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/baldwin/121102

 

 

 

A Word About The Elections by Chuck Baldwin, November 1, 2012A Word About The Elections
By Chuck Baldwin
November 1, 2012Archived column:
http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/archives/5229With the 2012 Presidential election just a few days away, it is almost superfluous for me to engage in any kind of in depth discussion, as most people cannot, for the life of them, get past the political theater that is currently crescendoing to a climax. Therefore, I will simply provide readers with a few passing thoughts regarding the elections next week.I think Mitt Romney will somewhat comfortably win the Presidential election. This will cause “conservatives,” Christians, and most Republicans to go into a state of deep hibernation, which will allow Romney to wreak havoc upon the Constitution and liberties of the people. In 2012, Barack Obama is the “Boogeyman” that must defeated at all costs. But the fact is, with the exception of Romney’s more business-friendly approach to economics, the differences between Obama and Romney are negligible.

As I have noted in previous columns, the differences between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama are miniscule on virtually every salient issue. They both supported TARP; they both supported Obama’s economic stimulus package; they both supported so-called assault weapons bans and other gun control measures; Obama has an “F” rating from Gun Owners of America, while Romney has a “D-” rating from GOA; neither man supports a balanced budget; neither man opposes foreign aid; they both supported the bailout of the auto industry; they both have a track record of being big spenders; they both fully support the Federal Reserve; they both oppose a full audit of the Fed; they are both supporters of universal health care; both men are showered with campaign contributions from Wall Street; neither of them wants to eliminate the IRS or the direct income tax; both men are on record as saying the TSA is doing a “great job”; they both supported the NDAA, including the indefinite detention of American citizens without due process of law; they both supported the renewal of the Patriot Act; they both believe that the President has “executive power” to assassinate and kill; both support the “free trade” agenda of the global elite; they are both soft on illegal immigration; they both support NAFTA and CAFTA; they both have a history of appointing liberal judges; they both believe the President has the authority to take the nation to war without the approval of Congress; and neither of them has any qualms about running up more public debt to the already gargantuan debt of 16 trillion dollars.Judge Andrew Napolitano nailed it when he said, “Barack Obama loves Big Labor; Mitt Romney loves Big Business; but they both love Big Government.”

Steve Baldwin (no relation) agrees. Steve is a former California State legislator and former Executive Director of the Council for National Policy. He said:“As someone who was asked by one of the presidential candidates to investigate Romney’s gubernatorial record, I can assure you there is little in Romney’s background to suggest he will be a Reagan-type president willing to undertake bold action to save our economy and restore our culture. I know every bill he signed and every statement he made as Governor. I know who his appointees were and the liberal vision that governed his actions. As Massachusetts Governor, he sided with the big government types in every crisis he faced. Indeed, he repeatedly sold out constitutional rights–freedom of religion, the 2nd amendment, etc., every time he had the opportunity to do so.

“He raised taxes on the private sector, destroyed job creation when he implemented RomneyCare, and came out in support of amnesty for illegal aliens. Most of his judicial appointees were to the left of Obama’s two appointments to the Supreme Court. As governor, he led the country in advancing three of the left’s most sacred issues: Cap and Trade, socialized medicine and gay marriage. Romney even supported Obama’s bailouts and the useless $8 billion stimulus. And he’s hostile to the notion of engaging in serious budget cuts, telling one reporter, ‘I’m not going to cut $1 trillion in the first year.’“Let’s not also forget that Romney’s advisors actually met with Obama’s advisors on a dozen occasions to assist them with designing ObamaCare! It’s no surprise that Romney is refusing to call ObamaCare a tax, even though it’s the largest middle class tax hike in American history.  The reason for this is because, while governor, his RomneyCare plan–the model for ObamaCare–was attacked as a tax and he argued it wasn’t.

“In other words, ObamaCare has been taken off the table as a campaign issue because Romney is afraid of being portrayed as a hypocrite for his past statements on this issue. This is reason number 167 why Romney should never have become our nominee.“I don’t care how his campaign portrays him today, his record as Governor is far more indicative of how he will govern than his campaign sound bites. If you’re not familiar with what I am disclosing about Romney, it’s because the truth about Romney was kept from Republican voters.  Yes, the conservative movement sold out to Romney. Starting in 2004, Romney created a slew of PACS and foundations that funneled thousands of dollars to hundreds of conservative groups, think tanks, grass roots leaders and GOP entities.

“In return, many of these entities that normally would have attacked Romney during the presidential primary went silent or even promoted him. I’ve tracked all of Romney contributions to conservative and GOP groups and it’s disgusting. It means that the leadership of our own conservative movement is up for the highest bidder and cannot be trusted to do the right thing. Even National Review, the nation’s leading conservative publication, took money from Romney and for the last six years blocked all articles critical of Romney. Instead, they published a slew of articles portraying him to be a conservative superstar. It was all phony and I can prove it.”Even though Romney will promote at least 85% of the Obama agenda, conservatives have no fear or trepidation of Romney because he is a Republican, whereas Obama scares the pants off of them because he is a Democrat. Ah, don’t you just love partisan politics?

Therefore, as I said, absent massive vote-fraud, Romney will be our next President. But he will do NOTHING to stem the tide of coming disaster. Romney will be a military hawk of the highest order. And while corporations doing business with the military-industrial complex will reap huge profits, America’s continued foreign interventionism is going to bring us to the brink of World War III. Furthermore, it is the “we are at war” mantra that is used to justify a burgeoning police state in America, which Romney will enthusiastically continue to implement. And unlike the Democrat Barack Obama, the Republican Mitt Romney will have little resistance–except from a Democrat-controlled Senate.Republicans will maintain control of the House of Representatives, which is probably a good thing; Democrats will probably control the Senate. Between the two, I had much rather have Republicans control the House, because trying to find honest-to-God freedomists among Republican US senators (you could count them on two hands) is like trying to find hen’s teeth. Again, Romney isn’t going to appoint freedomist judges anyway, so that argument is moot. But if the first six years of this century proved anything, it proved that neither major party in Washington, D.C., can be trusted with control of both chambers of Congress and the White House. That is a recipe for disaster!

At this point, I must remind readers that the reason Barack Obama was elected to begin with was due to the eight years of the phony-conservative G.W. Bush administrations. Americans were disillusioned and angry over Bush’s huge spending habits at home and his military adventurism overseas. I predict a Mitt Romney presidency will have the same effect. As with G. W. Bush, Mitt Romney will disappoint and anger the American electorate, which will pave the way for another leftist (Hillary Clinton?) to prevail in 2016.“And the beat goes on.”

At some point–maybe toward the end of Romney’s first term–the chickens are going to come home to roost. Neither major party has the guts to do what it takes to put America on a solid financial footing. They are both beholden to too many parasites that are sucking the life’s blood out of our country. And neither party will do a darn thing to stop this fascination with empire that is putting our troops in killing fields all over the world. The result: it’s only a matter of time before the inevitable happens. And just about anybody with half a brain knows it!It would be nice if a few states would elect freedomist governors, attorney generals, sheriffs, legislators, senators, secretaries of State, etc., next Tuesday. At the end of the day, freedom is going to be won or lost at the State level anyway. My son, Tim Baldwin, is running for a Montana House seat. Here is his website:

http://tim4hd4.comI know of a handful of other freedomists in Montana and around the country who, if elected, could make a real difference in their respective states. We’ll see.

So, if it makes you feel better, vote for Mitt Romney. He’s probably going to win anyway–but it won’t matter! But, by all means, when you find a for-real freedomist to vote for in the other races, be sure you do that, because that WILL matter!

*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link:http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?page_id=19

And follow my updates by liking the following Facebook pages:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Chuck-Baldwin/226997970644468

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Liberty-Fellowship-Kalispell-MT/190828020944911Also, follow me on Twitter:

https://twitter.com/#!/drchuckbaldwinAnd please visit my web site for past columns and much more at:

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com© Chuck Baldwin

 

BREAKING: Serious Vote Fraud Already Discovered in Ohio, NC as Voting Machines Record “Obama” When Voting for Mitt Romney

I began warning my readers about electronic voting machine fraud back in the summer of 2009 after I learned more about the design of the electronic voting machines and how easy it was to go in with a laptop and a passkey and reprogram or hack the machines to literally change the voting outcome. Fast forward to 2012 and look what is happening already:

Tags:  hacking the vote 2012, hacking voting machine, 2012 vote fraud Ohio North Carolina, electronic voting fraud 2012, vote machine fraud 2012 election

Was That an Ear Piece in Obama’s Ear During the Presidential Debate? (Picture)

Another WP news blogger has spotted an earpiece in Obama‘s ear during the last debate. So now you know. He won the debate by cheating, which is to say, someone somewhere was coaching Obama in the debate via the earpiece. It’s criminal. Put this S.O.B. out of work and vote him out of office. The only way he got ahead of Mitt in the last debate was by cheating. The photos don’t lie. See my re-blog for the other earpiece photo.

Next Day: After I tweeted this it went viral – and it should. It’s unforgivable to have a sitting president cheating in a televised national debate by being allowed to wear a damn earpiece. You better believe Mitt Romney didn’t have to resort to that. Vote this cheating fraud out of office. Restore the dignity and propriety of the White House and the presidency again.

Tags: photos obama earpiece debates, cheating obama national televised debate, presidential debate obama earpiece photos

Political Spin Trumps the Facts As the Final Days of Campaiging Grind On

Didn’t you know it would finally come to this? Each candidate’s campaign touts their candidate as “being in the lead” even as the dead heat tie plays out in the final days of campaigning. I’m all over the internet looking for any sign of impartial factual reporting, and it’s not easy to locate. Here are some links that might help. I voted this morning. I voted for Mitt for president.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/25/after-obama-claims-has-lead-new-poll-again-shows-romney-ahead/?intcmp=trending

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/10/25/fox-news-poll-romney-up-by-two-points-in-virginia/?intcmp=trending

http://www.politifact.com/

http://www.politifact.com/feeds/statements/truth-o-meter/

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82851.html?hp=l5

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82897.html

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/10/end-of-campaign-full-of-invective-from-both-sides-president-calls-romney-a-bullshter/

 

Browse The Politifact Truth-O-MeterTM: